The Border Would Be Secure IF Some American Politicians Were Not Criminal Participants-NAMING NAMES!!!
Recently, I asked a question; Why would anyone in Congress object to border screening unless they were profiting from the criminal enterprises at the border? This article will shed light on the possible answers to this question. Daniel Horowitz from Conservative Review asks another pertinent and important question:
We are told by the legal profession that nothing can be done to block bogus asylum-seekers from entering our country en masse, obtaining catch-and-release, and remaining here pending the outcome of a court decision that may be years in coming. But why is the DHS not at least deporting those who already went through this tedious process and have been ordered to be deported? Doing so would not only help eliminate public charge and potential gang members and drug runners for MS-13, it would deter the current and future wave waiting at the “conveyor belt” through Mexico from making the trip north.
In case you missed the announcement, three of the MS-13 gangsters who stabbed and burned the Maryland victim were refugees ordered to be resettled. What kind of court system and legislative branch do we have when they will not fulfill their first directive which is to keep their citizens safe? The poster child for this perversion is actress and puppet Rep. Ocasio-Cortez who recently admitted in a conversation with Commerce Secretary Ross, that she represents illegal aliens. Most reasonable Americans understand we need immigrants to fill jobs in the US. Subsequently, there is no valid reason keeping us from carrying out deportation orders that have already been issued. Just as we are searched before we enter a baseball game or a concert, all immigrants need to be screened for suitability to enter the country. But Congress says there is no emergency at the border as the opioid crisis continues unabated. Did I mention child-sex trafficking, drug running, etc., as well?
"Our Hands Are Tied"
Liberal legal scholars and judges says that the United States government has no choice when it comes to the catch and release of illegal immigrants after arrest, especially when they make claim to their mostly (90%) bogus asylum claims. Even if that were the case, and that is not supported by the facts, The question remains why we are not deporting the illegal aliens that have already been ordered to be deported. Would you care to guess how many of these illegal aliens have not been deported despite receiving court orders to do so by the courts? The total number of illegal aliens ordered deported , including nationals of all countries of origin, is a whopping 2.55 million! There is absolutely no reasonable explanation that is preventing our government from carrying out deportation orders that have already been issued by the courts. Hold on a minute, there is one possible answer to this never-ending question. The only answer to the question that key members of Congress and the rest of our federal government would ever object to reasonable border security, including those ordered to be deported, is because these officials are part of criminal enterprise that is so prevalent on our borders. If this government-sponsored criminal enterprise was truly contained at our border, perhaps we could adjust. However, as Marilyn Rupar and myself have previously reported, the criminal enterprise schemes that owe their origin to illegal immigration have invaded several of our communities including Humboldt, CA. However, Austin, Ft. Collins and many other join the wall of shame when it comes to its leaders forsaking the safety and welfare of its citizens. Since the MSM, owned by six corporations, is complicit in the coverup an do their best to prevent the Independent Media from reporting on this, we are forced to look for sources that will reveal the truth.
Answers: The Republicans Who Voted against the President's Declaration of a National Border Emergency
All of the following Republicans voted against the President's National Emergency Declaration and ALL of them belong to churches would profit from illegal immigration.
From Brietbart: Unholy Alliance: Christian Charities Profit from $1 Billion Fed Program to Resettle Refugees, 40 Percent Muslim Susan Collins Catholic Lisa Murkowski Catholic Marco Rubio Catholic Patrick Toomey Catholic Presbyterian Outlook Lamar Alexander Presbyterian Rand Paul (Libertarian) Presbyterian
Baptist Child & Family Services-CHURCH RAISING MONEY FOR ILLEGALS
Roy Blunt Baptist Roger Wicker Baptist
LDS Donates Millions for Refugee Resettlement Organizations Including Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services, U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, Episcopal Migration Ministries, The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society Church World Service, the Ethiopian Community Development Council, the International Rescue Committee, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and World Relief Corporation.
The nine agencies are responsible for contracting with the State Department to resettle refugees who arrive in the United States.
Mike Lee LDS
Mitt Romney LDS
Rob Portman Methodist Jerry Moran Methodist