DID ALEX JONES GET WHAT HE DESERVED?

DEAD BODY

EDITOR'S NOTE: AT THE TIME OF PUBLICATION, JONES WAS ONLY FINED $4 MILLION. THE PUNITIVE AMOUNT HAS BROUGHT THE TOTAL THAT JONES MUST PAY TO $45 MILLION. 

WHEN SANDY HOOK HAPPENED I DID NOT LOOK AT ALEX JONES PART IN COVERING SANDY HOOK BECAUSE I WAS EMBROILED IN A FIGHT TO SAVE MY COMMUNITY FROM HAVING OUR LAND CONFISCATED, WITHOUT COMPENSATION, BY jOHN MCCAIN AND HIS GLOBALIST FRIENDS. TO CLARIFY, I KNEW THERE WERE VICTIMS. HOWEVER, I DID NOT LISTEN TO JONES AT THAT TIME. TODAY, I INVESTIGATED AND HE DID INDEED PROMOTE THE HOAX THEORY AND ACCUSED SOME OF BEING "ACTORS". HENCE, THE DEFAMATION TRIAL. WHETHER WE AGREE WITH JONES, OR NOT, IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND THE VERDICT AND THE AWARD. HOWEVER, IN MY OPINION THE AWARD IS EXCESSIVE. MY HEART BREAKS FOR THE PARENTS BUT AN EXCESSIVE AWARD WILL NOT BRING BACK A CHILD. THE JUDGE'S CONDUCT WAS TOTALLY UNPROFESSIONAL AS I INDICATED IN THE RECORDING. THE PARENTS SHOULD BE DISMAYED AT THE CONDUCT OF THE JUDGE, BECAUSE IT PROVIDES AN AVENUE FOR APPEAL I WAS ALSO LEFT WONDERING IF JONES' LAWYER WAS THE BEST HE COULD DO. WAS HE OLD ENOUGH TO SHAVE? HIS INEXPERIENCE SHOWED AND THE JUDGE ADMONISHED JONES ATTORNEY ON THAT VERY POINT!

THE MOST OUTRAGEOUS THING I SAW THE JUDGE DO WAS TO TAKE UP WHERE THE PROSECUTOR STOPPED QUESTIONING A WITNESS AND THE JUDGE WAS HELPING THE PROSECUTOR MAKE A STRONGER CASE BY CONTINUING THE QUESTIONING OF THE WITNESS. WAS THE JUDGE A JUDGE OR A PROSECUTOR? SHE TOOK ON BOTH ROLES! THE JONES' LAWYER SHOULD HAVE MOVED FOR A MISTRIAL. INSTEAD, HE JUST ALLOWED THE JUDGE'S INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR TO CONTINUE. THE JUDGE ALSO DID EVERYTHING SHE COULD TO PUT JONES IN THE WORST POSSIBLE LIGHT SO AS TO INCREASE THE JURY'S AWARD.  THE COURTROOM OF THIS JUDGE WAS AN ABSOLUTE CLOWN SHOW! WHEN WE ARRIVE AT THE BOTTOM LINE, TODAY, NOBODY WON!