There is a plot to dim the sun. Yes, that is correct and these are words of researchers from Harvard and Yale. In effect, these researchers are suggesting a program that looks a lot like that conspiracy theory, chemtrailing. These researchers are also betting on the fact that the public has a very short memory when it comes to the exposure of global warming as a fraud in the past decade!

Harvard and Yale's Newest Fraud

Pseudo-scientists from the bastions of post-secondary-liberalism headquartered at Harvard and Yale universities published in the Journal of Environmental Research Letters a highly subjective article which proposes using a technique called stratospheric aerosol injection to fight against global warming.  Forgetting for a second that one of my academic expertise areas consists of statistical interpretation and research methodology, let's consider the proposed and laughable research being put forth in the journal in question. First of all, there is no scientific justification from either the literature review their own repeatable findings, located in this journal, that the concept is even valid. The article jumps from hypothesis to scientific conclusion with no scientific justification. There is no level of significance attached to this shoddy research. Further, this article concludes without scientific justification that these so-called scientists engage in a program in which sulfate particles are spread throughout the Earth’s lower stratosphere at altitudes that approximately 12 miles high. We already have this program and in layman's terms, it is called "chemtrailing". thi sis a classic case of putting lipstick on the pig. The article admits that the technology (ie chemtrailing) does indeed exist, but they fail to identify any program and scientific descriptions anywhere in the article.  Please reread the previous sentence. Do you realize what this means? Chemtrailing just left the realm of crazy conspiracy theories and is now part of mainstream pseudoscience. I never thought I would see a public admission of chemtrailing but that is exactly what we are seeing. The article falsely promotes the idea that this is new when in fact the evidence has been directly over our collective heads for over two decades. The article further purports, and without justification stated there are no aircraft suitable to carry the particles and “developing a new, purpose-built tanker with substantial payload capabilities would neither be technologically difficult nor prohibitively expensive”, the article concluded, but again, without scientific justification. Please look at the following which exposes the deliberate deception promoted in the article:

​

Where did the chemtrails, which fit the proposed intervention from this study come from? The researchers contend that the program does not yet exist and it too time consuming and expensive to carry out. The article further claims that they have estimated that it would cost $3.5 billion to launch a "dim the sun" system, and it would take 15 years. They further estimate that the program would cost $2.25 billion a year to maintain over the course of those 15 years.

​

These researchers from Harvard and Yale should get out more often. The proof for the existence of this technology and the ability to deliver it can be found all across the planet and the frequency and commonalities from country to country are ubiquitous. All one has to do is to look up!

​

Forgive me for stating the obvious, but the following is a common and daily scene all across our planet.

A Shift In Chemtrailing Strategies

In the history of geoengineering, the "environmental scientists" used to call the negative impact of man's unbridled use of energy to be the cause of "global warming". However, a funny thing happened on the way to deceiving the public. Global warming was the "catch all" phrase to describe how mankind was destroying the planet with uncontrolled use of various forms of energy. In 2008-2010, global warming researchers from East Anglia and Penn State University were caught faking data on global warming through a series of hacked emails in a scandal called Climategate. This prompted a change in the global warming claims and they were shifted to the term "climate change". This was a thinly veiled attempt to conceal the fraud that temperatures had actually cooled. Apparently, the Harvard and Yale researchers have returned to the concept of global in the hope that the public has a short memory of the fraud that was perpetrated upon the public a decade ago.

Dimming the Sun Is a Very Bad Idea

 Clifford Carnicom, once published a detailed report that demonstrated that “contrails” were poisoning the air. This was the genesis of research on the subject of the harmful effects of chemtrailing. The issue, through notable researchers such G. Edward Griffin, et al, established this fact a long time ago and now the MSM and the pseudo-scientific community have the nerve to perpetrate another fraud by pretending that chemtrailing is somehow a new discovery that should be used to dim the sun to protect us from global warming, a concept that has already been discredited. The net effect of chemtrailing is devastating. In my interviews with Dane Wigington, he states that the poison chemicals in chemtrailing have led to a dramatic increase in Alzheimer disease and a precipitous drop in collective IQ's of 6 t0 7 points. Additionally, 18% less sunlight reaches the earth resulting in lower crop yield. The discovery of the latter set off alarm bells for many researchers because this dramatically impacts crop production across the planet. A nagging question remains, why would Harvard and Yale reintroduce and make public previously introduced chemtrailing as fact after so much MSM effort has gone to deny the existence of these programs? And now they admit to and advocate for this program in a public research journal? Why? It is my belief that there are two factors associated with this shift in position"

1. Public funding is now going to necessary in order to increase chemtrailing to the desired level. Therefore, the concept must be introduced as a novel idea.
2. The omnipresent use of chemtrails must continue under whatever guise is possible. If one's goal is the dumbing down of the human population as a form of anesthesia designed to numb people to the change ts that they are being exposed to, this could be an effective approach. And of course, no discussion of chemtrailing would be complete without the mention of depopulation. Cognitive disorders and related health effects are certainly part of this equation and there is no doubt that the rate of Alzheimer's is exploding across the planet, negating any potential life-span increases due to the effective progress made against infectious diseases.  And finally, the ultimate goal appears to lie in lowering food production across the planet. Is this an attempt to use food as a weapon in a novel manner? At this point, it is a novel but as of yet, an unanswered question. However, I strongly recommend that researchers in the IM be watchful of other programs designed to lower food production.

My considered opinion on these suspicions is that all of these motivations are connected to bringing chemtrailing out of the closet into the mainstream. This issue has the potential to become the number one threat to all of humanity because of the multiple and far-reaching effects.