What is the true story behind the so-called suicide of Jeffrey Epstein? Only three days ago, Bill and Hillary’s further and highly suspicious associations with Bill and Hillary Clinton have, again, come into the light of day. From the perspective of many of the globalists there was a lot to lose in permitting this to go forward. Epstein’s attorney asked for a year’s delay so he could prepare a million pages of evidence. This was clearly a leverage ploy that Epstein was sending a message that he was going to take many household names down with him as possible if his demands were not met. He had to go. However, I am 100% certain that Epstein is not dead. How can I be so certain? Because I have been down this road before, both with Ken Lay, have and later I had my own situation with something called a dead man switch.

If one really wants to understand and be certain about the fact the Jeffrey Epstein was not murder, and he did not commit suicide, then one needs to be willing process a lot of materials that sets the foundation that Jeffrey Epstein is alive and well. 

Dead Man Switches

Loosely defined, a dead man switch is an insurance policy against being assassinated for what one and the accompanying threat of the release of incriminating evidence. Any who deals in highly sensitive and possibly incriminating material would be a fool not to a number of dead man switches. In this process, the valued information is shared with sources that will release the information upon the death of a potential whistle blower. The mechanics of this practice are simple and loosely consists of the following variables:

Never give dead man switch material to a known associate. It is too easy to trace. Keep in mind that JFK assassination researchers believe that over 300 people were killed to keep some incriminating evidence from coming to light. These people included Lee Harvey Oswald to Jack Ruby, to Bobby Kennedy, and to media figure Dorothy Killgalin.

• It is recommended that only people with at least 3 degrees of association distance be used.
• No electronic or other communication between anyone in this chain can exceed one degree of association.
• Individuals are used as drop points on a rotating basis and there are time limitations. The more sensitive the information, the shorter the time frame. It is not safe to remain the holder of information. Attorneys are a favorite source because of their confidentiality provisions. Losing one’s career is a powerful incentive for silence.
• All materials must be hand delivered and frequently there is a chain of delivery protocols involving multiple source and the information is labeled as something benign.
• The potential whistleblower cannot be allowed to know the final identities of the recipients for obvious reasons. The triggering process is automatic.

There is more to the process, but this overview makes it clear that this a highly compartmentalized operation. And the failure to adhere to other strict protocols endangers anyone in the chain.

Applications of the Dead Man Switch

Breitbart failed to follow these protocols and he paid for it with his life, plus he made a major mistake in announcing the future release of information regarding President Obama. Breitbart received some very bad advice, or a lack of advice.

My Uses of Dead Man Switches

I have used dead man switches on two occasions, that I am free to presently mention, in my journalistic career. In 2010-11, I cracked the conspiracy between Goldman Sachs, BP and other globalist entities which demonstrated that the so-called “Gulf Oil Spill” was a conspiracy between various globalist interests for power and control. My work was cited on hundreds of occasions and received prominent credit by the late Jim Marrs in one of his books.

Benghazi Revelations

The other time that I used dead man switches was related to what I learned about Benghazi and the complicity of top level Obama officials including, but not limited to, Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta. Benghazi occurred in the run up to the 2012 election. Rumors were circulating as to why CIA operative and Ambassador Chris Stevens had to be murdered to keep the stories of gun and drug running and child-sex-trafficking, out of Lybia, quiet so Romney could not use the material in the 2012 election. By the way, do you want to know how badly Romney threw the election? I sent him all the evidence on the day I went public. He could have destroyed Obama and chose not to.

After the Ambassador’s assassination, I was approached by a very high level military/intelligence asset. He revealed how AFRICOM’s commanding officer, General Hamm and Carrier Task Force Three’s commanding officer, Admiral Gayotte were going to disobey orders to stand down and positively respond to the Ambassador’s repeated electronic pleas for extraction. Remember, then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton had twice denied, as late as August of 2012, Stevens the ability to have his security team increased from 4 agents to a platoon of marines. She twice refused.

Most of the country does not know how close the US came to experiencing a military coup over the Benghazi affair in which Obama allowed, at minimum, Ambassador Chris Stevens to be murdered by the very al-Qaeda forces that he was supplying arms to on behalf of the CIA in Libya and Syria. Coincidentally, Stevens murder took place just two months before the election when word on his arms deals were being rumored. Of course, this is just a coincidence.

Two of the top four military commanders in the Middle East, AFRICOM commander, General Hamm and Carrier Strike Force Three Commander, Admiral Gaouette tried to launch a mission to rescue Stevens. This was a coup attempt in response to the reign of terror being perpetrated by Obama against the viability of our military.

The American people have failed to recognize the sacrifice made by these two leaders.  As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack. When General Hamm received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening the order by his second in command, Colonel Rodriquez. Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.” Stevens and his security team were subsequently murdered.

Do not make the mistake in minimizing the fall of Hamm and Gayouette. The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, that their replacements required approval from the Senate. Make no mistake about it, this was a military coup being conducted at the highest level of our combat forces. Enter the clean up specialist, John Brennan was a former American intelligence official who served as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from March 2013 to January 2017 and he was brought in by Obama to clean up the Benghazi mess. I still do not know what happened to Gayoutte. Hamm avoided prosecution and converted Islam as did Brennan.

Can we only imagine the headlines if Hamm and Gayoutte were successful in saving Stevens?  Can you imagine the reaction of America had it been revealed that an ambassador, on behalf of the administration, was running guns to terrorists and was financing the operation with child sex trafficking  and the selling of guns and drugs? Would you have liked to have had a front row seat at the press conference when Stevens told all under an agreement of immunity? One of two things would have happened: (1) A military coup would have taken over the White House; or (2) The House of Representatives would have brought articles of impeachment against Obama and a trial would have been held in the Senate. Hillary would have gone to prison as would have most of Obama’s cabinet.  The globalists, seeking to destroy America, through the destruction of the military, would have suffered a tremendous setback. If Stevens only had a dead man switch.

Subsequently, and for my protection, I let it be known that I had already disseminated the information before releasing the Benghazi story. Some in the media chastised me in October of 2012 as being delusional. By February of 2013 thru 2014, many started to report the same facts.  

Ken Lay and Enron

I had one other experience with dead man switch and it involved Ken Lay of Enron. Former CIA asset, the late Bill Pawelec, and former NSA agent, Vance Davis, and myself, were deeply involved with Ken Lay and Enron regarding the use of what is euphemistically called free energy and the origin of this energy source and I was told this the original source, was not terrestrial. With help from sources not known to myself, Pawelec had invented, based upon leaked technology a free energy device in which once the devices was powered up, it would run indefinitely without the need for a recharge. It was this technology that got Tesla removed as the elite’s scientist of choice in the 1920’ because they wanted to meter electricity and charge for the use.

Enron’s Ken Lay was already in pursuit of this information when he and Bill Pawelec found each other. On the surface, their meeting was a marriage made in heaven. The two parties made plans to build an experimental community in the San Luis Valley in Colorado that was going to be based on this technology energy device in which once the devices was powered up, it would run indefinitely without the need for a recharge.  

So, what happened? Enter Andrew Weissmann, as he has served as a key political and legal hitman for years. Who is Weissmann? He was on Robert Mueller’s special prosecuting team and he led the prosecution of Paul Manafort, the longtime Republican operative who led Trump’s presidential campaign for several months in 2016.  Back in the late 1990’s, Weissmann was sent by Clinton to disrupt our group’s association with Enron. In short, Weissmann was sent to take down Ken Lay and Enron. It has always been our belief that Ken Lay was innocent of all charges and he was taken down by Weissmann to prevent the release of this technology to the public arena. Subsequently, I was a party to a three-way-call between Pawelec, a senior Enron official and myself. In the conversation, dead man switches, related to our technology, were actually discussed. Later Pawelec learned that Lay did not commit suicide, he was given the option to disappear and live in obscurity in exchange for his life and the life of his family. Lay had this option because he implanted dead man switches which frightened the elite with regard to their control over key technologies which would free humanity. The climate change hoax, designed to gain control over all energy sources in order to “save the planet (lol)”, had to be maintained as the guiding governmental philosophy. In this light, free energy cannot be allowed to come to the surface. Ken Law was originally motivated because of the tremendous potential with regard to financial compensation and the freedom that that would be afforded to all on the planet.

Epstein’s Dead Man Switches

Epstein had proprietary information on the illegal and immoral sex habits of many of the global elite. Of course he had a dead man's switch. His day in court had to be prevented, just as Lee Harvery Oswald’s day in court was prevented. Dead men tell no tales. However, the dead man switches that Epstein surely would have been in place if he were assassinated and therefore, had to be negated. A fake suicide, just as I believe happened to Ken Lay, was the best solution for both parties.

For these reasons, I believe that Jeffrey Epstein will live out his days in obscurity. Even President Trump does not believe the fiction being perpetrated against the American people. as exemplified by the President retweeting the following: