How Far Will the Enforcement Agents Working for Fauci, Gates and the Deep State Go to Enforce Lockdown Compliance and Carry Out the Horrors of Medical Martial Law Camps?
Under a false sense of security,and absolute ignorance, the vast majority of the American public really believe that American troops will not fire upon American citizens, or even cause undue harm. Unfortunately, history as well the field of psychology demonstrates why only a minority of soldiers will actually resist committing the coming atrocities against the American people over the fabricated need to protect America from the COVID-19 scam which primarily only impacts the elderly with fatal illnesss already in progress.
POSITION STATEMENT OF THE COMMON SENSE SHOW REGARDING CV-19 AND THE PRESENT MITIGATION EFFORTS:
FOR THE RECORD, IT IS THE POSITION OF THE CSS THAT THE AVERAGE AMERICAN IS NOT IN ANY UNDUE DANGER WITH REGARD TO THE PRESENT CORONAVIRUS SITUATION.
THE ELDERLY AND THE FRAIL, WHO ARE SUCCUMBING, HEALTHWISE, ON A NUMBER OF FRONTS, COMPRISE THE POPULATION THAT SHOULD BE TARGETED FOR MEDICAL INTERVENTION. ALL OTHER AMERICANS, EXCEPT FOR THE IMMUNE SYSTEM COMPROMISED, SHOULD FULLY RESUME ALL NORMAL ACTIVITIES.
THE CV-19 EVENT IS BEING EXPLOITED FOR POLITICAL REASONS AND EVENTS SUCH AS WALMART AND OTHER BOX-STORES BEING ALLOWED TO OPERATE WITH VIRTUAL IMPUNITY, WHILE SMALL BUSINESS COMPETITORS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ENJOY THE SAME BENEFITS, REPRESENTS A 14 AMENDMENT VIOLATION.
WHEN THE HOLY CHURCH OF WALMART IS ALLOWED TO BE OPEN AND CHURCHES CANNOT, THIS SERVES TO EXPOSE THE SATANIC NATURE BEHIND THE SHUTDOWN.
CV-19 COMES FROM CHINA AND AS PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST STATED, IT IS AN "ARTIFICIAL EVENT" THAT "WAS UNLEASHED UPON AMERICA.
THE PURPOSE BEHIND THE LOCKDOWN IS REGIME CHANGE AND PLANNED ECONOMIC COLLAPSE LEADING TO A BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION LED BY THE DEEP STATE AND THEIR DEMOCRATIC PARTY LEADERSHIP MINIONS (EG PELOSI, SCHIFF, HARRIS, SCHUMER, CLINTON).
FAUCI, GATES AND DEMOCRATIC PARTY LEADERSHIP ALONG WITH THE CV-19 TEAM, RIDDLED WITH CONFLICTS OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS, ARE LOCKING DOWN AMERICA UNTIL A MANDATORY VACCINE CAN BE UNLEASHED AND AMERICA WILL NOT BE OPENED UNTIL SAID VACCINE IS DISTRIBUTED AND CONSUMED VOLUNTARILY, OR BY FORCE
America is exhibiting minor resistance to the CV-19 lockdowns and "minor" is the operative word. Therefore the question before us is whether the enforcement agents in this country will carry out unspeakable horrors against the American people as they begin to resist are artificially imposed upon us. Will these minions resort to deadly force? Celeste Solum and myself are on the record as saying "Yes, they will!" What does the field of psychology predict the enforcers will do to Americans who resist the theft of our nation?
Conformity to Group Norms: The Solomon Asch Experiment
Do you think of yourself as a conformist or a non-conformist? If you ask most people the same question, you would find that most people consider themselves to be a non-conformist and would be able to stand up to a group when they know they are right. However, can nonconformists actually resist the peer pressure to blend in with the rest of their peers?
In the 1950's, Polish born psychologist, Solomon Asch, conducted a conformity study. The participants signed up to participate in a psychology experiment in which they are asked to complete a vision test. This was a deception. The real experiment attempted to answer the question, can people resist peer pressure to conform to a false belief? Seated in a room with the other participants, the research participants are shown a line segment and then asked to choose the matching line from a group with three segments of different lengths.The experimenter subsequently asked each participant individually to select the matching line segment. On some occasions everyone in the group chooses the correct line, but occasionally, the other participants unanimously declare that a different line is actually the correct match. Unknown to the main subject of the experiment, everyone else in the experiment is a confederate and their answers have been preplanned for the purpose of determining whether, or not, the participant's answer can be determined by the people deliberately giving the wrong answer.
Nearly 75 percent of the participants in the conformity experiments went along with the rest of the group at least one time.
After combining the trials, the results indicated that participants conformed to the incorrect group answer approximately one-third of the time. At the conclusion of the experiments, participants were asked why they had gone along with the rest of the group. In most cases, the students stated that while they knew the rest of the group was wrong, they did not want to risk facing personal criticism. A few of the participants were so weak-minded that they suggested that they actually believed the other members of the group were correct in their answers.
These results suggest that conformity can be influenced both by a need to fit in and a belief that other people are smarter or better informed. Given the level of conformity seen in Asch's experiments, conformity can be even stronger in real-life situations where stimuli are more ambiguous or more difficult to judge. For example, a soldier, in attempting to decide if they will fire upon innocent civilians, will be forced to weigh their own risk. If they fail to obey the command to fire upon American citizens, will they face disciplinary action, or even death?
Asch also found that having one of the confederates give the correct answer while the rest of the confederates gave the incorrect answer dramatically lowered conformity. The psychology behind the incessant "social-distancing ads" in the media is based upon this notion. In this situation, just five to ten percent of the participants conformed to the rest of the group. Allies, committed to a central belief, is what drives many in the alternative media to relentlessly pursue the truth and then inform as many people as will listen.
The Zimbardo Prison Study
In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. He wanted to further investigate the impact of situational variables on human behavior.
The research question the researchers asked was how would the participants react when placed in a simulated prison environment? For our purposes today, we are asking the medical martial camp scenario. What kinds of beehaviors can we expect from people staffing these facilities. This would include the Washington CV-19 camps under construction in in which extracted children will be sent to the camps. One can rest assured that children will not be the last to occupy these three camps already under construction.
Zimbardo had previously speculated that, "Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place, or, would their goodness triumph?" The results of the experiment haunt many of us in the psychology field, today, as we ponder how far would Americans go in the enforcement of a brutal and vicious tyranny? Zimbardo set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building, and then selected 24 undergraduate students to play the roles of both prisoners and guards. The assignment of roles was accomplished through random selection. The participants were selected because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues and had no major medical conditions. Therefore, the participants in the study were far more psychologically and physically healthy than any group of modern day military force, police force or FEMA camp guards.
The volunteers agreed to participate for a one- to two-week period. Prisoners were to remain in the mock prison 24-hours a day for the duration of the study. Guards, on the other hand, were assigned to work in three-man teams for eight-hour shifts. After each shift, guards were allowed to return to their homes until their next shift. Researchers were able to observe the behavior of the prisoners and guards through the use of hidden cameras. The experiment was originally scheduled to last two weeks, but it had to be stopped after just six days due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became exceptionally abusive and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress, anxiety and nervous breakdown. The prisoners and guards were allowed to behave in any manner they chose. However, the interactions were generally hostile or even dehumanizing. The guards began behaving in an aggressive and abusive manner toward the mock prisoners. Subsequently, nearly all of the prisoners became passive and depressed. Five of the prisoners began to experience such severe and acute anxiety, that they had to be released from the study early. Zimbardo later wrote in his book The Lucifer Effect that "Only a few people were able to resist the situational temptations to yield to power and dominance while maintaining some semblance of morality and decency; obviously I was not among that noble class" .
Even Zimbardo lost his objectivity and the experiment was only halted when his girl friend at the time, Christina Maslach, a graduate psychology student, voiced objections and threatened to break off her relationship with Zimbardo if the experiment continued. The Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior. Because the guards were placed in a position of power, they began to behave in ways they would not normally act in their everyday lives or in other situations. By putting a prison guard uniform on the participants, issuing sun glasses and a baton made the participant guards act in accordance with their perceived role. This has dire consequences for the ability of uniformed personnel to resist orders from their commanding officers to fire upon American citizens. People will act according to the role that they have been assigned to play. Finally, based upon the Zimbardo Prison Experiment, and again, what kind of treatment could you expect at a FEMA Medical Martial Law camp?
The evidence seems strong that the authorities will do exactly as they are told in this COVID-19 crisis. However, there are some exceptions that I address in the following broadcast which, at least, leaves some level of of hope that our enforces could, but not likely, join with the people.
This is definitely holocaust territory and America is completely unaware, for the most part, about what could lie ahead.
As we assess our prospects to free ourselves from this tyranny, there are other psychological factors that come into play and they will be covered in the next part in this series.
Speaking of Celeste Solum, her presentation at the GEN SIX Conference that was recently concluded, can be accessed by video on demand. For more information on how to register, please click here.