Virologists have ‘resorted to anti-scientific practices to make their claims’

Submitted by Dave Hodges on Friday, April 19, 2024 - 19:10.

PATRICIA HARRITY

According to the doctors Bailey, they have spent the last four years with their allies dismantling every aspect of the virus model whether it concerns “isolation”, antibodies, genomics, PCR, proteomics, electron microscopy, or animal and human studies. Additionally, in recent webinars Dr Mark Bailey has discussed with Dr Tom Cowan, the concepts of independent variables and controlled experiments, among other areas. Mark says ‘Clearly the virologists have resorted to anti-scientific practices to make their various claims including the foundational claim of virus existence.‘

A Limited Hangout.

Nobody has been able to ‘seriously refute’ their material that has “left no stone unturned’ Mark Bailey told Gareth Icke in a recent interview on Ickonic, where he also claims that “the Wuhan Lab, gain of function theory, is ‘just a limited hangout.; See the video below from 5.10

Wuhan Lab Is A Limited Hangout – Dr Mark Bailey Talks To Gareth Icke Tonight.

Apical Logical Fallacy…

Mark Bailey had been motivated to write an essay, he says (Below) ‘specifically addressing the apical logical fallacy in the cell culture technique – something that has been noticed previously but perhaps not formally expressed’

Dr Mark wrote: ‘The virologists have claimed they perform control experiments and sometimes describe these as ‘mock-infected’ cultures. In recent months we have also been contacted by people in the ‘no virus’ community asking whether John Enders inadvertently performed a control experiment in his 1954 measles paper. Dr Stefan Lanka exposed the lack of a control experiment in this paper in the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court in 2016 and I make some further comments expanding on this in note 20.’

‘The pivotal issue is that the virologists do not have an independent variable and their experiments cannot make a hypothetical particle real. The ‘gold standard’ technique for “isolation” cannot possibly determine the presence (or existence) of viruses no matter how they attempt to control it. The paradigm that was created in the 1940s to keep virology alive was dead on arrival because the technique relies on a reification fallacy and logical errors that disqualify the entire process from being scientific.’