Supreme Court Rules To Trash Lawsuits Against Biden For Vaccine Mandates, Thereby Stripping Away Precedent To Dissent Against Mandates

SUPREME COURT

JACOB M. THOMPSON

ustice Kentaji Brown, appointed by Biden, who cannot define what a ‘woman’ is, was the only dissenting voice.

To close out 2023, The United States Supreme Court quietly ruled earlier this month to throw out lower appellate district court rulings that challenged President Biden’s Covid-19 vaccine mandates for public employees and the Armed Forces, which effectively strips away any future precedent to challenge any future vaccine mandates or of the suchlike.

In other words, if the federal government wants to mandate any future vaccines, for example, chances of getting it repealed in court are probably moot and dead-on-arrival.

On December 11th, the three lower court rulings in question – Payne v. Biden, U.S., No. 22-1225, Biden v. Feds for Medical Freedom, U.S., No. 23-60, and Kendall v. Doster, U.S., No. 23-154. – were rendered “moot.” All three cases were filed before Biden’s federal mandate was rescinded in May.

As explained by Bloomberg Law of the day of the rulings: ‘the justices vacated decisions from the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth, Sixth and DC Circuits on whether federal employees can challenge the vaccine requirement in district court under the Civil Service Reform Act.’

 

READ THE FULL STORY