by Steve Watson

Paul put forth the case that "the First Amendment really isn't about protecting the speech of government workers the First Amendment says Congress shall make no law it's about limitations on government involvement with speech."

Paul continued, "if Twitter says bad things about me and puts up bad things and takes me down I have no recourse against Twitter, same with Facebook. I'm mad, I hate that YouTube has taken my speeches down I don't do business with them anymore, because I think they're bigoted, biased and wrong-headed on this."

"As far as threats, what we do know from the Twitter files is that the government was making threats," Paul continued, adding "there were threats of Anti-Trust action against the companies if they didn't take the material down, there was also threats of we will remove your 230 protection. Section 230 gives them liability protection and there were overt threats and threats in writing basically saying if you don't take this down you know your 230 protection of liability could go away."