The Kremlin Never Learns
It is irresponsible for Washington and Washington's NATO puppet states to provoke Russia. But seeing weakness in the Kremlin, it is hard for the West to restrain itself. The West now dismisses Russian threats as bluster. Consequently, the West has moved from provocation to aggression. With arms shipments and diplomatic support, the West has become a de facto combatant allied with Ukraine against Russia.
The Kremlin is now faced with a much enlarged frontier with NATO from the prospect of Finland, with its long border with Russia and nearness to St. Petersburg, joining NATO. Finland is under no danger of Russian attack as matters stand, but will be if Finland joins NATO. Joining NATO means Finland will be nuclear-targeted, which currently the country is not. It is obvious that Finland's security deteriorates if Finland joins NATO.
So why join?
The most obvious answer is that Washington has paid the Finish leaders to add to the pressure on the Kremlin by joining NATO. I have good reason to believe this. Years ago I was in the Pentagon in the office of a very high official being offered an important appointment. I used the opportunity to ask a question about something that had long puzzled me. How, I asked, does Washington manage to get foreign governments to support Washington's interests at the expense of their own countries? "Money," the high Pentagon official said. "You mean foreign aid," I said. "No," the official said, "we give the political leaders bags full of money. We own them. They report to us."
Neither country is in danger of attack from Russia. How many US dollars did it require for the leaders of these countries to decide to sell out their countries for filthy lucre?
The sellout goes further than Finland and Sweden. If these bought-and-paid-for-governments join NATO, they have also sold out the entire Western World. This would make it clear to even the Russian liberals, who handicap Russia’s existence as a sovereign nation, that the Western World intends to do what the American neoconservatives declared to be the principle goal of US foreign policy: to prevent the emergence of a rival that has sufficient power to constrain US hegemony.
Why, after three decades of this doctrine being declared as “the principal goal of US foreign policy,” has the Kremlin failed to understand it?
At this point even the liberals in the Kremlin should comprehend that the Western World is a permanent enemy more dangerous than the Third Reich. When the Russian liberals are forced to confront this fact, will they still be willing to trade Russian sovereignty for acceptance by the West?
The Russian government is a very strange government. For years the Kremlin tolerated oligarchs from the Yeltsin era who stole Russian assets. Today the Russian government continues to provide its deadly enemies with energy and strategic minerals so that they can conduct their war against Russia. The director of the Russian Central Bank left the central bank’s reserves on an unguarded shelf where the West could steal them. Putin still has in office some who set up the oligarch system that tied Russia in a subservient role to Western financial capital.
The Russian government permitted George Soros and his organizations to operate in Russia, funding and brainwashing Russian youth against their own country. The Russian government permitted Western media organizations freedom to propagandize the Russian people against their own government.