Fauci's Research Fraud Endangers Every Life In America and Will Lead to the Complete Collapse of the Economy
On the way to establishing the fact that the Democratic Party at the local level is involved in a concerted and uniform effort to tear down the Constitution, something else has jumped to the front of the line.
The medical mouthpiece of the New World Order, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has reared his ugly head is he is, by far and away the most dangerous figure in America today.
First, let’s establish who Fauci is. As Glenn Beck recently pointed out, he wrote what amounts to love letters to Hillary during the 2016 campaign. He is also partnered with Bill Gates, which goes hand in hand with the fact that CDC is the nation's Vaccine Central dedicataed to the spread of vaccines, of all types. This has become the main mission of this rogue organization.
Fauci appeared to have made a concession speech and was apparently admitting that his projection that COVID-19 was so much more deadly than the flu was self-admittedly false. I admit that for 24 hours I was taken in by his deception. Let’s take a look at research that he co-authored in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Below are the key excerpts from the so called study:
If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.
The efficiency of transmission for any respiratory virus has important implications for containment and mitigation strategies. The current study indicates an estimated basic reproduction number (R0) of 2.2, which means that, on average, each infected person spreads the infection to an additional two persons. As the authors note, until this number falls below 1.0, it is likely that the outbreak will continue to spread. Recent reports of high titers of virus in the oropharynx early in the course of disease arouse concern about increased infectivity during the period of minimal symptoms.
Let’s sum up Fauci’s so-called findings: His co-authored “study” states that the transmission rate is only 2.2. That flies in the face of the Italians and the Chinese whose rates were clearly reported between 5.5 and 6.5.
Fauci et al also stated that the death rate was the same as the flu and that number was placed at 0.1%.
Please keep in mind that I have extensive academic experience in research an statistics at both the college and university level. In short, I know my way around this type of material. I am not claiming intellectual superiority to Fauci et al. However, I can easily recognize fake research based on poorly defined and operationalized terms and concepts and this precisely what we have here. In short, I recognize Fausi's attempt at getting away with academic fraud in the name of a political agenda. Laymen might refer to this as the bravo sierra of research.
Below are some of the academic issues I have with Fauci's publication and his so-called "research".
1. I am referring to this as a so-called study because I can not find any original research on the current COVID-19 situation in America. The data sets are missing. The article, not study, refers to other research and documents said research to arrive at the numbers presented (0.1% death rate and 2.2 transmission rate). This is not a research study of any significance, it is a review of research studies.
2. The conclusions of the research defy even the most simple of research concepts, such as face validity. Face validity answers such questions as what does the research look like and what kind of research conclusions do we THINK we can draw? It is a common sense estimate. And the face validity of this article is an unmitigated joke and any former student of mine would not have gotten out of the midterm with this kind of sloppiness. The conclusion of the article failed to address the fundamental concepts of preventing transmission at the base level. Social distancing of 6 feet does not successfully mitigate the issue of transmissibility. The airborne particles can be transmitted several feet by such things as sneezing is an ignored issue in the Fauci et al article. Common sense would dictate that the wearing of a mask when one is in the presence of others should be required. This is such an obvious omission from Fauci's et al recommended mitigation strategies. One has to question the sincerity of the so-called interventions listed in the Fauci et al article. Also, how does Fauci et al know the death rate since they do not know the true infection rate? This is would like saying that a batter in baseball is a good hitter because he has 100 hits. That is an irrelevant statistic unless one knows how many at bats the hitter has had. The same exact principle should be applied to the death rate. In order to calculate the death rate, the only way one can be reasonably sure of the death rate is to know how many people are infected and contrast that figure with the number of who have died.
This so-called study may contain citations and be published in the New England Journal of Medicine but it is not research and it cannot accurately estimate the transmission rate and the death curve. The failure to recommend wearing of masks, from what we know, would prevent a lot of the transmission because a social distancing of 6 feet does not cover the potential distance a simple sneeze. This is an absolute oversight which in inexcusable. And the concept is so basic and simple, that it is difficult to believe that this oversight occured by accident. Am I saying that this is an example of research fraud? This article is the poster child for fraud.
In contrast, I turned to Mike Adams’ figures which are unclouded from the Democratic Party perspective, unlike Dr. Fauci. I posed the question to Mike about the transmission rate and he quickly corrected me. He said the velocity of spread is the issue and his data shows the infection rate is doubling every three days.
As a point of definition, the velocity rate at this point in time, is the key figure. Since we are in the beginning phase of the spread of the virus, how fast the virus spreads (ie the velocity rate) is one of two key issues that should be researched and Fausi et al are totally ignoring the topic. The other key element in the early days of the spreading of a virus would be the preliminary death curve estimates, in which I have already stated that one cannot know the rate unless we know the infection rate. Get ready for this revelation, one cannot know the death rate unless EVERYONE is tested. Unless we are serious about testing everyone, we are not serious about fully understanding and treating the virus.
From the available research, it is clear that the following must occur if we are serious about first, understanding the virus from a statistical and research perspective:
1. Everyone must be tested.
2. Everyone in public must ear a mask.
3. Finally, as Mike Adams points out, the velocity rate must be understood. If we do not know the velocity rate, we do not know how fast it is spreading.CV-19 clearly spreads much faster than the flu, and not understanding this along with taking common sense preventative actions, means that many people are going to die that do not have to. Predictably, this will lead to more calls for longer and more complete quarantines and guarantee an absolute economic collapse from which there will be no return.
At the end of the day, it is diffiuclt to believe that the CDC's goals are connected to ending the CV-19 threat as quickly as possible. It strongly appears that the CDC is dedicated to spreading this virus. And this where we turn back to the politics of the issue.
The continued spreading of the virus benefits Democrats because our ineffective mitigation efforts are crushing the economy. Fausi's contrived ignorance will lead to more deaths and calls for much longer confinements of the public. The effect on the economy will be catastrophic and this endangers Trump's re-election and places the future of the Republic and our civil liberties at risk.
This is the ultimate coup that does not involve the use of guns.