Is Romney Delivering a Thinly Veiled Assassination Threat to Trump (for the Third Time)?
Mitt Romney, a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Does lightening ever strike twice in the same place? Well, when it comes to the animosity of Mitt Romney, it just did. In fact, it has struck three times. For the third time in two years, Romney delivered what could considered to be a thinly veiled assassination threat to Donald Trump. It is subtle, but it is undeniable and it has now happened for the third time under very similar circumstances in just over two years.
Romney Rips Trump, Again
Despite the fact that President Trump endorsed the Senatorial candidacy of Mitt Romney, Romney repaid this debt to the President with a scathing op-ed in the Washington Post as well as comments made by Romney to reporters on the same topic. It was these comments delivered in front of the Hinckley Institute backdrop, that caught my attention,
Trump Responds, but the Controversy Is Far From Over
In the latest press conference, the President was asked about Romney's scathing criticism, and he said the following:
History Repeats
Walk with me through the journey of discovery which will clearly demonstrate why Romney delivered his message to Trump in the manner that he did and he has done three times and as the readers will see, this a mystery filled with bizarre twists and turns. .
An Innocent Revelation
On Saturday, March 5th, 2016, I was honored to be able to speak to the members of Arizona Breakfast Club, which is a loose confederation of political activists. The group is sponsored by Arizona resident, Ernest Hancock, a long-time and very formidable political activist and the founder of the popular Freedoms Phoenix website. While handling the Q & A following my presentation, it was pointed out to me the odd coincidence between the attempted 1981 assassin of President Reagan, John Hinckley Jr., and the backdrop of Mitt Romney delivering his blistering condemnation of Donald Trump this past week. While Romney was condemning Trump, he did so in the front of a moniker entitled “The Hinckley Institute“.
John Hinckley Jr.
Following Hinckley’s shooting of Reagan, he was portrayed as a mentally ill wayward rich boy who attempted to kill Reagan to impress actress Jodi Foster. I never believed the cover story and I would suggest visiting this link in order to validate my concerns with this theory. Both Robert H Hinkley and John Hinckley, Jr., are both related to each other and this lineage extends back well into the 19th century. However, there are many lineage coincidences between the various Hinckley’s that come into play with regard as to why Romney chose the Institute to deliver his threat. When it comes to Reagan assassin, John Hinckley Jr., there is much more than meets the eye, though his close and distant relatives list, in which Hinckley is related to the following notables:
Barack Obama
JP Morgan
Johnny Carson FDR
Princess Diana
Marilyn Monroe
Warren Harding
Allen Dulles
Prince George
George H. W. Bush
Anderson Cooper
Adlai Stevenson III
George W. Bush
Winston Churchill
Benjamin Spock
George Washington
Charles Darwin
Wright Brothers
Ulysses S. Grant
Jeb Bush
General MacArthur Calvin Coolidge
John Kerry
Prince William
Benedict Arnold
I would suggesting visiting the following link and you will, as I have, come to believe that John Hinckley, Jr. was nothing more than a Manchurian Candidate whose mission it was to assassinate Ronald Reagan. Do you think these connections are merely spurious and any such linkage are unfounded? Look at the AP news release from 1981.
“Bush Son Had Dinner Plans With Hinckley Brother Before Shooting” -Associated Press (March 31, 1981)
Conclusion
Please allow me to ask a hypothetical question. What if the background for Romney's rebuke of Trump were done in front a background entitled, The Oswald Institute, or the Booth Institute, do you think more people would be having a different discussion.
It appears to that when Romney delivers a scathing criticism of Donald Trump, he uses the Hinckley background. Yet, in other press releases, he does not exclusively rely on the Hinckley background. At this point, it is prudent to ask, do these scathing rebukes of Trump actually constitute a thinly veiled threat against the President dating back to the primary days of 2016? To answer that question, one has to decide how dedicated to being a coincidence theorist one actually is.
Pray daily for Donald Trump’s safety.
Comments
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment